Image via Wikipedia

“The match that lit this fire,” McCain said, came from the government-sponsored mortgage companies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which backed risky home loans “with the encouragement of Sen. Obama and his cronies … in Washington.”

Obama shot back: “The biggest problem was the deregulation of the financial system. … Sen. McCain, as recently as March, bragged about the fact that he is a deregulator.”

It was a classic example of Washington finger-pointing. McCain and the GOP blame Fannie and Freddie — which were taken over by the government last month — because the troubled mortgage agencies’ biggest backers were Democrats who said they wanted to increase access to homeownership.

Meanwhile, Obama and other Democrats highlight Republicans‘ longtime focus on limiting regulations for the financial industry.

No single government decision sparked the crisis, but collectively the candidates had a point: Both parties in Congress played important roles in setting the stage for the ongoing financial meltdown.

They did so in moves that reflected not just their ideological priorities, but also the wishes of special interests that have spent millions aggressively lobbying Washington and contributing to lawmakers’ campaigns.

By not reining in increasingly risky investments made by Fannie and Freddie — and by keeping complex financial instruments known as derivatives free from most government oversight — Congress chose not to impose barriers that economists widely agree could have helped stave off the crisis that continues, even after lawmakers approved a $700 billion emergency bailout package for Wall Street.

Here is a look at how Congress’ actions on two key fronts became significant factors in the financial crisis:

Read the rest at USATODAY

Related articles

• So Much For Downplaying Expectations
• John McCain Promises To “Whip” Obama
• From the Mouths of Republicans II
• A Prophet Who’d Rather Not Mention It
• This is why McCain canceled the debates. Watch Sarah Palin on CBS tonight. Utter disaster.
• Debate Coaches: ‘Lost,’ ‘Aimless’ McCain Must Make Vast Improvements
• John McCain Can Still Win The Presidential Campaign (Guest Voice)
• Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac execs now offering advice to Obama
• Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac execs now offering advice to Obama By Jerome R. Corsi
• McCain Tries to Sell Out the Republican Party

Barack Obama, congress, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, John McCain, Politics, Republican, Wall Street Hide

Image via CrunchBase, source unknown

The financial sector continues to be buffeted. However you get your news -television, car radio, computer, newspaper - several stories seem to be standing out (besides the obvious and very real trauma suffered by those in Texas in the wake of a terrible hurricane). Former giants in the financial sector are collapsing or struggling to hang on.

The latest casualty? Lehman Brothers folded and Merrill Lynch is being bought by Bank of America, noted here in the New York Times: www.nytimes.com/2008/09/16/business/worldbusiness/16markets.html along with the fact that stocks took a rapid downward turn,fueling talk of a Black Monday.

Since Lehman Brothers has been around for so very long (158 years), the news of the firm’s demise was a huge shock to many, particularly the info (which could change at any moment, though it doesn’t seem likely) that there won’t be a government rescue of the company, no last minute reprieve or intervention as there was with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

Black Monday and stock market crash fears increase as Lehman Brothers goes under…

More here

Related articles by Zemanta

• Richard Adams: The mortgage monster created by US bankers is getting its revenge
• 3 Wall Street giants at the brink
• Merrill in talks with Bank of America: report
• Mortgage Rates Fall on Lehman, Merrill News
• Tk
• Lehman Brothers collapse: Q
• US Collapse: Lehman has $613 billion debt
• Wall Street crisis: Is this the death of global capitalism?
• BoA Steps In For Merrill Lynch
• Asia stock markets fall on Wall Street shakeup

Bank of America, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Lehman Brothers, Merrill Lynch, New York Times, Stock market, United States Hide

The federal government will not pay the ousted chief executives of mortgage finance companies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac up to $24 million in exit packages.

The Federal Housing Finance Agency notified former Fannie Mae CEO Daniel Mudd and former Freddie Mac CEO Richard Syron that such “golden parachute” payments will not be paid. The housing agency, which took control over the companies earlier this month, made the announcement on Sunday.

“It would have been unconscionable to award these inflated salaries, particularly when the leadership of Fannie and Freddie can hardly be given good grades,” Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., said in a statement.

Mudd had been due to receive up to $8.4 million in compensation, while Syron was due to receive up to $15.5 million, according to calculations by David Schmidt, a senior consultant at executive compensation consulting firm James F. Reda & Associates.

More at MSN

Related articles by Zemanta

• Dems: Departing mortgage execs pay ‘too high’
• Congress Floats Fannie, Freddie Salary Caps
• Obama Objects Severance for CEOs
• Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Seized by Govn’t, Top Execs Still Make Out Like Thieves That They Are
• Management shake-up at Fannie Mae
• U.S. takes control of Fannie, Freddie
• Fannie Mae Posts Nearly $3.6B Loss in 4Q
• Investors sue ex-Fannie Mae execs
• Fannie-Freddie takeover expected
• CEO Salaries Weather Mortgage Crisis

Business, Chief executive officer, Daniel Mudd, Fannie Mae, Freddie, Freddie Mac, Richard Syron, United States Hide

Image via Wikipedia

The fate of the world financial system hangs from a thread today after the New York office of the Federal Reserve stood up to the big Wall Street financial houses on Sunday and essentially told them, “thanks but no thanks” on their request for a bridge loan to nowhere.

It’s about time. For years, the country’s major broker-dealers and banks have competed with each other to become the No. 1 underwriter of loans, bonds, mergers, mortgages, swaps and equities. The industry’s compensation system is focused on rewarding managers who took big risks, and could bring home top rankings in dealmaker lists.

All the while, banks figured that if they really got into trouble, the federal government would back them up with taxpayer funds. And the government reluctantly complied twice this year, backing up the reckless behavior of high-flying bankers at Bear Stearns in March, and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac last week with loan guarantees costing untold billions.

But when Lehman Brothers chief Richard Fuld came to the Fed with his hand out on Friday, the central bankers had finally had enough – and told the banking industry that it needed to come up with its own solution to its problems. In meetings over the weekend in New York that must have frozen the veins of bankers used to bullying the government into doing their bidding, the government left Lehman Brothers and all its creditors out to dry, figuring it was better to let the financial system burn to the ground than to risk any more of the Federal Reserve’s withering balance sheet.

More at MSN

Related articles by Zemanta

• Turning point
• Lehman: More Socialized Losses For The Wealthy
• Lehman Brothers files for bankruptcy as credit crisis bites
• Cutting time for Bernanke?
• Subprime crisis: A timeline
• Analysis: Enough is enough on Wall St.
• Greenspan says economy in crisis
• Greenspan: Economy in ‘once-in-a-century’ crisis
• The chicken game over Lehman
• Lehman Brothers collapse: Q

Bear Stearns, Business, Fannie Mae, Federal Reserve, Federal Reserve System, Freddie Mac, Lehman Brothers, Wall Street Hide